During the national School Walkout Day protests, two schools in the town where I formerly taught took very different approaches. At School A, student leaders met with administrators to design an "administrative-sanctioned plan" for a moment of silence and reading of gun violence statistics. The plan had no "political context," but would instead "honor the students and staff who lost their lives." The principal notified the parents that it would not "impact instructional time" and that everyone would be supervised, whether they left the building or not.
School B, interestingly, gave students the choice to walk out of class, but also meted out a morning detention to students who "cut" class. Both schools had many students participate, and police were on hand, to protect them, parents were told. The difference?
"Shall we be content to obey them?"
Civil disobedience occurred only in School B, because no laws were transgressed in School A.
I say this only to define civil disobedience. It is certainly worthwhile to honor the tragically slain students and teachers, but only at School B can students' actions be defined as civil disobedience.
Henry David Thoreau said, "Unjust laws exist. Shall we be content to obey them? Shall we endeavor to change them but obey them until we have succeeded? Or shall we transgress them at once?"
Here's a working definition of civil disobedience
For a protest to count as civil disobedience, three conditions must be met: the law must be broken peacefully, it must be broken publicly, and the person must be willing to suffer the legal penalty. That is what distinguishes civil disobedience from anarchy. Submitting to the law's punishment shows respect for the concept of law, just not that particular law. In accepting detention for cutting class, the stated penalty for cutting, School B students became civil disobedients.
The whole point of a protest is to oppose the authorities, in this case, the schools. It is based upon Thoreau's idea that there is a higher law than the government, and when the government is unjust, people should resist peacefully.
Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.
― Henry David Thoreau
The History Dr's Top Five Acts of Civil Disobedience in American History
- The Declaration of Independence, 1776. Those who signed accepted that the hangman's noose was their fate if caught.
- The Underground Railroad, 1790 to 1860. Consider the famous case of Simeon Bushnell. He and his cohorts defied the Fugitive Slave Act to save a captured runaway slave from being returned to bondage. Bushnell et al were fined and jailed. When they got out of jail, they rescued other runaways, and everything they did was illegal.
- Martin Luther King's March on Selma, 1965. King's famous 1963 Letter from the Birmingham Jail gave mankind its greatest articulation of civil disobedience theory. He distinguished just laws from unjust laws.
- Burning draft cards in the 1960s. Draftees during the Vietnam War who did not believe the war was just, including Muhammed Ali, who loudly refused to fight. His actual words are in dispute, but “Why should black folks fight a war against yellow folks so that white folks can keep a land they stole from red folks?" became famous.
- Environmental groups who vandalize business interests. The Earth Liberation Front destroyed Hummers at a California car dealership, claiming that they did it for a higher moral purpose: to save the earth from corporate polluters who own corrupt legislators. The Paddle in Seattle illustrates further.
You may think of others, of course, not listed here. The point is that civil disobedience has a long and proud tradition in the United States, which itself was born of rebellion.
The Golden Trumpet of 1776
The most difficult of dilemmas is deciding when we must go outside the law in order for justice to prevail. Americans pledge allegiance to their flag and to their republic, but they do not surrender their conscience to the representatives. How should a patriot react when the laws of the land conflict with conscience? There may be times that we must defy the laws of our elected representatives. Is civil disobedience disruptive? Yes, it can be, but please recall the History Doctor's definition of a patriot: anyone who strives to improve the quality of life in their society is a patriot.
Each individual citizen must search their own conscience. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Jefferson wrote the Declaration and also famously observed that "a little rebellion now and again is a good thing." He means that when citizens break laws en masse, they reveal the problems of society and delineate remedies.
Patriotism is not the occasional outburst of sentimentalism; it is the slow and steady and quiet determination of a lifetime, to serve the cause of freedom, justice and equality for everyone. Even to do something illegal and then suffer painful consequences.
Students at School B served their detention.
Did you gain any interesting insights or facts from this post that are worth passing along? Please share.